What percent of debt and equity transactions close
without any adjustments to the financial statements?
Not enough, as independent due diligence invariably
uncovers material errors in the statements.
In some of our recent engagements, we found:
- 2006 EBITDA understated by nearly $1.1
million and 2005 EBITDA overstated by over $1.2
million, impacting trailing-twelve month EBITDA for
purchase price calculation. A well-known national firm
had reviewed the financial statements. Client:
Fundless Sponsor.
- CEO-directed manipulation of audited
financial statements resulting in overstated earnings
and assets. Undocumented related-party
transactions. Client: Mezzanine Lender.
- EBITDA adjustments related to financing
and aged inventory. "Big 4" accounting firm had
audited financial statements. Client:
Private Equity
Fund.
- EBITDA overstated by $300,000, reducing
purchase price by over $800,000. Client:
Fundless
Sponsor.
How do these errors happen and why aren't they
uncovered sooner by the companies or auditors? The
answers range from procedural inadequacies by the
independent auditors or internal staff to blatant fraud.
What can you do? Clearly, you should conduct your
own thorough financial due diligence. Please contact
us at (310) 789-1777 or by replying to this email if you
would like a checklist of things to look for.